Sailing into the port of Mumbai you could be
fooled into thinking it was Hudson Bay, New York. The skyline is littered with
skyscrapers – beautiful modern constructions: glass, curved, multistory and
helipad-roofed. Of course, closer inspection of the city from the ground
reveals quite a different sight. Looking down rather than up, sprawling slums
nest around the bases of high-rises – the juxtaposition of wealth and poverty
for which Mumbai is infamous. But this this chronic Indian wealth disparity is
not the subject of this particular piece. Rather, I want to highlight the misfit of many of India’s recent “development
solutions” for the country itself, starting with these buildings. It is a misfit for which I believe India has
the Western world to thank.
Mumbai by night |
Environmentalists argue that recent increased
air temperatures in Mumbai are directly linked to the numbers of new glass
skyscrapers in the city. The glass used in these buildings streamlines sunrays,
magnifying their intensity, creating a literal greenhouse effect within the
buildings. This then requires vast amounts of A/C energy consumption to cool
the buildings back down, and this dramatic increased energy use is heating up
the whole city. Most of these glass buildings are either corporate offices or hotels,
supporting the ever-increasing number of foreign workers in the city. The modernity
of the buildings has brought Mumbai up to par with its global economic
counterparts: New York, London, Tokyo, Shanghai as a legitimate centre of
business and commerce. It almost seems that without such modernity, Mumbai is
somehow left behind as a world player in big business. In rainy London and
chilly New York, the greenhouse skyscraper design works well. The glass
buildings save on heating costs as they warm up quickly with just a little sun.
But in India they make absolutely no sense when a less expensive alternative
could, by design, keeps its interior cool. This is a classic example of cookie
cutter model failure: a design that works in the West, but fails elsewhere.
I must confess I cannot take credit for
noting this fact about the buildings. Social and environmental investment advisor,
Neeraj Doshi, brought it
to my attention when he presented at the recent training conference for fellows
of the IDEX Fellowship in Social Enterprise.
The IDEX programme, for which I am a field coordinator, puts recent graduates
from India and worldwide in 10-month placements with local social enterprises
or schools in India. The aim of the programme is to give fellows the
opportunity to learn about socially driven enterprise in India from an on the
ground perspective, developing their own solutions to problems by getting a
field understanding of the need.
I believe Doshi’s point about the misfit of
the Mumbai buildings rings true above and beyond climate conditions. I spent
last year as an IDEX fellow myself in Hyderabad, working in an affordable private
school serving the low-income community in the old and orthodox Muslim part of
the city. My job was to identify challenges the school faced and develop and
implement sustainable solution programmes to help them. One of my central
projects was to help develop a learning difficulty scheme to improve the situation
for the children in the school identified as “basic learners”. I started my
research, as many do, with trusty Google, thinking about the kinds of support
children with learning difficulties receive in my home country, England. In the UK, the government offers testing of children
with learning difficulties and provides lots of great resources for free. After
some research, I discovered exactly the same opportunities for government
testing exist in India, and it was a simple case of getting kids to a testing
centre in Hyderabad. I triumphantly announced this discovery in my school and
was surprised and disheartened to be met with very little enthusiasm and a lot
of anxious head bobbles. I couldn’t see the problem. One teacher eventually
explained. “None of the parents will go for it,” she told me, “over here that’s
basically a doctor certifying that your child as stupid.”
Working with mothers in school |
The Human Centered Design toolkit www.hcdconnect.org is an incredible resource developed by IDEO and the Gates
Foundation for people working in development. HDC is about putting people
first. Rather than working from problem straight to strategy hypothesis, you
must first take a step back to understanding the motivations of all the key stakeholders
in any one situation. IDEX fellows train in this kind of design thinking and
try to bring in this approach to the work we do in India.
We did still make headway with the learning
difficulty programme at my Hyderabad school. It involved a film screening for
the parents of the as fantastic Taare Zameen Par, a Bollywood blockbuster by
Aamir Khan about a boy growing up in India with dyslexia, as well as a session
led by a local respected a Muslim lady explain to the parents, in Urdu, that
learning difficulties just mean a different style of learning. Often dyslexic children
are more creative and have high IQ’s than others. Since then, a number of children
in the school have received government testing, through the choice of the
parents, and are now benefitting from extra exam time, scribes and free
resources.
One size does not, and should not, fit all |
Sometimes, I believe people who work in
development get so wrapped up in the business plan, the models and the jargon,
that they can lose sense the most important part of the project process: the
people that they are trying to help in the first place. People are not cookies, and one shape does not
fit all. Social enterprise and human centred design, with hands on research as
well as implementation is, in my view, the only way forward.